Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Ironic Advent 2016 Meditation #4: Dietrich Bonhoeffer's Ironic Advent




Ironic Advent Meditation #4: 
Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Ironic Advent*

 Bonhoeffer in the yard of Tegel Prison, Berlin, summer 1944.

My interest in, love for, and ongoing dialogue with the life and work of Dietrich Bonhoeffer is well known to my friends. A few years ago, I made a Bonhoeffer pilgrimage in Germany. For years I kept his Letters from Prison close by for late-night reading when I couldn’t sleep. Other years it was the anthology of his works: A Testament of Freedom. One entire year was the mammoth definitive biography by Eberhard Bethge. 

*This is not the place to do more than mention my sadness at the way Bonhoeffer’s thought (admittedly open-ended at times) has been simplified and used  by readers and writers on the right and left (whatever those terms mean anymore), both theological and political.* If you aren't afraid of reading something thoughtful, I'd recommend you read Karen V. Guth's. "Claims on Bonhoeffer: The Misuse of a Theologian" in Christian Century Online, May 13, 2015. It's title above should be linked to her excellent and fair-minded article. 

Advent had always played a special part in the life of Bonhoeffer and his family. The ironic reality, however is that he came to believe that he had never fully understood Advent (and one might even say Christmas and Christianity) until he was in prison. If I might say so, he came more clearly to understand Advent as an ironic sign of the love of God (something I wrote about yesterday in a VERY different way). "Come On, Charlie Brown."

There is much to say about this but not now. Tonight, I just want to share some of Bonhoeffer’s comments (from letters smuggled out of prison by friendly guards). And to provide some very limited commentary on them, especially for people who might not be that familiar with Bonhoeffer’s situation. For those who want some basic background information about Bonhoeffer’s life, thought, and writings, I recommend the short biography included with The Letters and Papers from Prison

Nov. 21, 1943


Life in a prison cell reminds me a great deal of Advent—one waits and hopes and potters about, but in the end what we do is of little consequence, for the door is shut, and it can only be opened from the outside. This idea has just occurred to me. But you must not think that we go in for symbolism very much here!

Nov. 28, 1943


Advent Sunday. It began with a peaceful night. As I lay in bed yesterday evening I looked up our favorite Advent hymns . . . . Early this morning I held my Sunday service, hung up the Advent crown [wreath] on a nail, and fastened Lippi’s picture of the Nativity in the middle of it [Fra Lippo Lippi's most famous Nativity, "Adoration in the Forest" is included after this passage]. For breakfast I ate the second of your ostrich eggs—I just loved it! Soon after that I was fetched from my cell for an examination which lasted until noon. The recent air raids have brought a series of calamities . . . .



How marvelous that you are home for Advent! I can imagine you singing hymns together for the first time just as this very moment. It makes me think of the Altdorfer Nativity [see below] and the verse:


                The crib glistens bright and clear;

                The night brings in a new light here.

                Darkness now must fade away,

                For faith within the light must stay.


And also the Advent melody:

[he provides a measure of music, staff lines and all; sorry I don't know how to reproduce it]

though not in the usual four four time, but in the swinging expectant rhythm [love this] which suits the text so much better. 


[The stunning, unexpected, dark, and, may I say, ironic Nativity painted by Albrecht Altdorfer in 1513 shows the Holy Family in what appears to be a bombed-out building of 1943 Berlin]

In another place Bonhoeffer asks: "How did he [Altdorfer] come to defy tradition in that way four hundred years ago? Was his meaning that Christmas could and should be kept even under such conditions as these? Anyhow, that is his message for us." 


December 5, 1943, Advent II 


My thoughts and feelings seem to be getting more and more like the Old Testament, and no wonder, I have been reading it much more than the New for the last few months. It is only when one knows the ineffability of the Name of god that one can utter the name of Jesus Christ. It is only when one loves life and the world so much that without them everything would be gone, that one can believe in the resurrection and the new world. It is only when one submits to the law that one can speak of grace, and only when one sees the anger and wrath of god hanging like grim realities over the head of one’s enemies that one can know something of what it means to love and forgive them. 

I don’t think it is too Christian to want to get to the New Testament too soon and too directly. . . . You cannot and must not speak the last word before you have spoken the next to last [this sounds a familiar theme in Bonhoeffer between ultimate things and penultimate, insisting that the penultimate (human culture, family, love, art, marriage, doing justice, etc.) not be swallowed up by our “ultimate” concerns (the so-called Last Things—death, judgement, heaven, and hell)].


A few days later, Bonhoeffer expounded on this theme in a letter that has influenced my life and thinking very deeply. Referring to a pious song with the line “this poor earth is not our home,” Bonhoeffer develops his “Old Testament” idea of taking this “poor earth” very seriously indeed.

Dec. 18, 1943

A very important sentiment, though one which can only come right at the end; for I am sure we ought to love God in our lives and in all the blessings he sends us. We should trust him in our lives, so that when our time comes, but not before, we may go to him in love and trust and joy. [Of course, at this point, Bonhoeffer was very much missing the companionship and bodily presence of friends, family, and his fiancĂ©.] 

Speaking frankly, to long for the transcendent when you are in your wife’s arms is, to put it mildly, a lack of taste [!], and it is certainly not what God expects of us. We ought to find God and love him in the blessings he sends us. If he pleases to grant us some overwhelming earthly bliss, we ought not to try and be more religious than God himself. . . . It is arrogance to want to have everything at once—matrimonial bliss, and the cross, and the heavenly Jerusalem . . . . “To everything there is a season.” (Ecclesiastes 3).

Perhaps in another post, I can include Bonhoeffer’s comments on the beloved German poet/hymn writer, Paul Gerhardt. And some of his thoughts, as Christmas was approaching, when he realized that he would not, in fact, be released to be home with his family as he had hoped he would be.

For now, I will close with one of the prayers Bonhoeffer composed for his fellow prisoners that Advent/Christmas season of 1943. 

Lord Jesus Christ
You were poor and in misery, 
a captive and forsaken as I am.
You know all our distress;
You abide with me 
when all others have deserted me;
You do not forget me, but you seek me.
You will that I should know you and turn to you.
Lord, I hear your call and follow you;
Help me. 

The picture below is of the Bonhoeffer children with their mother, Paula. The future theologian and martyr is the blonde!
* This meditation originally appeared in 2016



Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Ironic Advent 2016 Meditation #3: Come on, Charlie Brown


Ironic Advent Meditation 2016 #3
Come on, Charlie Brown


                 When Lucy says to Charlie Brown, “come on,” she literally means, “kick the football.” But still. It’s a kind of a come one, isn’t it? Assuming I remember what that means. I think  I vaguely remember what it was like to come on to someone or have someone come on to me. Vaguely, I say. Somewhere the mists of forgetful time and the hardening of the arteries. After being all “open” and “raw” (which, of course, can be the most boring rhetorical poses in a writer’s intro to creative non-fiction arsenal) in Ironic Advent Meditation #2, I suppose I’ll just go ahead and offend just about everyone and try to say a couple of true things tonight before I lay down my sleepy eyes and hardened heart and await the coming of more nothing much in particular. 
                The one thing I will say, and I’ll have to ask the forgiveness of my first and best teachers (well my first anyway), the nuns of Our Lady of Mercy Elementary in Mercedes, Texas (Mercy/Mercedes, my early life had a certain poetic lilt to it if nothing else), that come on feels good.  You are standing next to someone, for example. Let’s say she happens to be looking at you with brighter than usual eyes. Let’s say she is obviously sending you messages by mental telepathy not to mention a language deeper than words that . . . whatever. Let’s just say be safe and say . . . she obviously likes you. Or maybe you are sending the messages. That feels good too, unless they are not received or, worse, rejected.
                But, don’t worry. I’m not going into the gory details. I’m just saying. This happens. It feels good. SO good. Now, we may be in certain situation or context in which, although it feels good, it is not ultimately a good, healthy, or appropriate thing. We probably all differ a little on what those situations or contexts are, but we probably all agree that there are some limits. But the actual experience of feeling like somebody really likes you that way is one of life’s great joys. I feel like I should quote C. S. Lewis here to make everyone think that I’m not just talking crazy, but I can’t think of anything he said other than something Hyoi, the hrossa, said in Out of the Silent Planet, and I’m not prepared to provide that much background to you, dear reader.
                When Lucy comes on to Charlie Brown it’s a good feeling for him at the time, even though it ends badly. Although, like lots of us, maybe most of us, he has his doubts whether this can be the real thing. I mean, he’s been burned before. Signals can be misinterpreted. We can even be intentionally misled by cruel girls holding footballs. “Come on, Charlie Brown,” she repeats. Seductively. Personally, I think the fact that she always called him by his complete name was a clue that she wasn’t sincere. But I also honor Charlie Brown’s naivetĂ©. I hope you do as well. 
                So I know what you're thinking. This is the part where old Ben Camino forces Advent into whatever the hayll he's been talking about. To be fair, those who know me (all named Jennifer, interestingly enough) know that I’ve probably really been heading this way from start despite my unexpected premise. 

             Advent is the time before. The time of waiting. The time when we pray and sing, “Come on (different meaning!) Emmanuel.” Or “Come, Thou Long-Expected Jesus.” Or “Let the King of Glory Come.” Or, my favorite, “Come on, Eileen.” And we try to believe, and maybe get tired of trying but then get a bit more excited again the more candles we light and the more chocolate we eat from Advent Calendars and other phony Advent sacraments, that this big prelude has a even bigger pay off. That the Advent come on really means something. That the Lord of the Universe, who flirts with us, is not going to just pull the football away again. 
               Or maybe that the girl (or guy) we met last week who was shining like a star (and we’re pretty sure that’s because she or he was just basking in our freaking love glow) really just had too much to drink. Or got carried away with the dancing (come on, Eileen).
                It’s a risk every time. And, in the big football field of life (as on the dance floor), even when you finally believe and go for it (or only sort of believe and go for it anyway), you might just end up looking like a fool. And people gon’ point at you and say, “there goes old wishy-washy Charlie Brown.” Aka:  what. a. dope.
                I’m way to too tired tonight to go into the seventeen and half  arguments for the existence of Divine Love right now. Besides even LOVE can say, “Well, I still might just pull the football away  anyway (see Job, see the Gospel according to Peanuts, see the followers of Jesus and their plans to overthrow the Romans with their new King and all).” 
         But I’m going to hope otherwise. And I’m going to embrace what I take to be a very appropriate (for once) come on offer from someone I hope will turn out to be the Lover of my soul. I’m going to do my best to prepare to meet the Bridegroom as they say in the ancient liturgy. Not going to hide it under a bushel, no. Wait, what does that mean? 
                I wrote about some tough stuff yesterday. If you didn't read it, you still can. It's Meditation #2. This is #3. So, it's literally on the margin of this piece. Just click on it. Anyway, today I talked to an old friend and found out some other facts I didn’t know about someone I either did or didn't abandon, depending on how you look at it. Things that make yesterday’s story even sadder, even more difficult to figure out. 

               This story may turn out to be sad too. The Divine come on is the greatest, most brutal lie of all, if it’s a lie. Or it’s the greatest true myth. Love knows me? And Love still wants me? Hmm. 

               There’s a song I didn’t mention because it’s actually . . . too hot (sorry). It’s Mary Chapin Carpenter’s song, “Come on, come on.” Don’t listen to it. It’s too hot. I'm telling you. If anyone provides a link to it, I will have to banish them forever from the Ironic Advent Universe. 

        On the other hand, Marvin, that’s what I’m talkin’ about. 

Click below for 
Come on Eileen
               

Monday, November 28, 2016

Ironic Advent Meditation 2016 #2: Charles Ricke Figures It Out



Ironic Advent Meditation 2016 #2: 
Charles Ricke Figures It Out


Nita wanted to die. Anyway, I think she wanted to, but of course they say that people sometimes try to do things but not really die. That sounds risky to me. And it’s probably not a great idea to stand back and cite the children’s classic The Boy Who Cried Wolf  as your reason for standing back. That’s risky too. Everywhere we look it’s like that—risk, risk, risk. Missy says, “be careful with your heart, bubba.” I say, “it’s too late, I read the gospel.” Missy is my sister. Nita was my mom. My name is Ben Camino. Today is the second day of Advent. And this is Ironic Advent Meditation #2 for 2016.   
            I suppose some women in the 1960s had the decency to keep their mental illness a secret from their children but not Eudora Juanita Ricke.  With a name like that, I guess you just didn’t worry too much about keeping things quiet. I do appreciate the silent and dignified way of handling pain and tragedy. The Canadian Way, I like to call it. I think of my father and his friends who went through God knows what kind of hell during the war, but just about never talked about it.
            My mother was not so good at suffering silently. And I didn’t inherit the gene either. I still have some of the letters she wrote to my siblings and me (there were four of us before Noel died. Three of us remain, depressed in various ways, to varying degrees, and variously medicated). She wrote in that super-shaky hand which most people associate with extreme old age or palsy but which I will always associate with my mother under the influence of shock treatment. 
            They were messy, sloppy letters, so look away dear reader if, unlike Jesus Christ, you like things neat and tidy. And if you don’t like to think of electrically-stimulated young mothers, puffed up from insulin treatment, with very little short-term memory (including sometimes  their children’s names), talking about their infatuation with their handsome psychiatrist. All of this, to some degree, because of yet another scientific fad on the part of “mental health professionals” to use “technology” because it made it look like they knew what they were doing when they were doing stuff. Working on the assumption that a machine could fix the soul.  
            I’m not sure who to blame, though. It’s seems to be to be an incontrovertible fact that conditions that we find to be a problem are difficult to fix. It’s hard enough even to know what we mean by fixed. But we keep trying. 
            I was thinking the other day about pain, the kind we obsess about in our culture since we don’t have much starvation, genocide, or mass epidemics or anything. Please don’t get all up in my business about this dear reader, WE don’t. Read about Rwanda or Syria or Haiti. Then tell me about how bad things are. I don’t blame us, though, for feeling that other kind of pain, obsessing over it, even being overcome by it.
            Whatever Keats had in mind (or, being Keats, had in heart) by his “pleasure thermometer,” I do believe in a kind of “pain thermometer.” We adapt to an environment which does NOT administer the “necessary” quality or quantity of pain which evolution, at some deep level, has shaped us to expect by holding on to and perhaps even intensifying other kinds of pain. Hamlet knew this. And Lear. They weren’t afraid of the ague or of execution.  They were afraid that the world didn’t love them enough. 
            It’s like an inverse of old so-and-so’s hierarchy of needs. I call it the pyramid of suffering. Basic physical suffering is the most obvious kind, the kind that shouts to the world, “Notice me, please. I am physically suffering.” This is the kind of suffering that charity and/or political revolutions should and often do make it a priority to address and relieve. But give those “relieved” victims a century or so of relative peace, safety, health, and satisfaction, and  so much stuff that they don’t have to worry where their next Mazlow “D-need” is going to come from, and they will develop enough ennui to fill a  festival of plays by  Edward Albee (who, believe it or not, never went to bed hungry).  “Behold,” he shouts to the world on their behalf, “we have everything and yet still fear that the world doesn’t love us enough!” 
            I know my mother feared that, and sometimes believed it enough to start heading towards  the exit. I have journals she wrote when she was as young as twelve and some that she wrote in her sixties. She always seemed to be in search of some kind of love or acceptance that the world was withholding. As if she craved the kind of love that would match her flamboyant name.
            Why her mother, Jewel, who was only fifteen when my mother was born, gave her the name Eudora Juanita, I really don’t know. I’ve heard suggestions, but they don’t make sense. Being raised a hard-scrabble Baptist (please don’t tell me that Mary Karr has already used that phrase ), there was, of course, no possibility of a proper christening and exorcism until many years later. A pity. I’d like to think of some pioneer German or Irish priest asking all the devils to leave little Eudora Juanita Thompson, and her neck starting that slow Exorcist turn . . . . 
            Well, anyway, she had them. The devils I mean. Notwithstanding the fact that her grandfather, an Ozark Mountain dirt farmer, who had traveled to Texas and Oklahoma looking for something better for his family, would regularly preach for any Protestant (he would say “Bible”) church that would take an offering for him. He was all things to all (Protestant) men. A Baptist to the Baptists. A Pentecostal to the Pentecostals. A snake-handler to the snake-handlers. And Enoch and Elijah to the Papist Antichrists. 
                Whatever good he did as a preacher, he did not fill up the Pascalian vacuum inside his grand-daughter. Or himself, it seems, since he took his own life with a shotgun outside his farm house near Hot Springs, Arkansas when I was a boy. That empty place led Nita, as she came to be known, to several attempts to do likewise. Fortunately,  my father, the war vet with two purple hearts (and a more obvious claim to suffering) never left a gun with ammunition around where she could get her hands on it.
                Of course, I do wonder, even then, and even with the hospitalizations and slashed wrists of my teenage years, not to mention the long periods away in the Victoria State Hospital through so much of my childhood, if she ever really meant to go through with it. I’ve always wondered. After all, I’m like her. I understand drama’s appeal, especially it’s (false) promise of order and transcendence. I too would like to shake my fist and cry out, “I need more love.” In fact, I think I do it quite often. I’m a vampire that way. 

                I need. More. 

                Dear people have found it important to psychoanalyze me, boiling whatever I happened to be doing at the time down to the fact that I was “needy” as they like to put it. As if they had discovered the hidden key to all my problems and my future behavior modification(s). As if to be needy was the sin against the holyghost.
               Well I say unto thee: NOT to be needy is the sin against the holyghost. Hay’ll yes, I’m needy. If anyone is listening. I need more love. The world sometimes, maybe oftentimes feels like a cheat. I’m just way too afraid of dying to try anything that might end it all if I should make a mistake when I tried to fake a mistake. I may be needy, but I’m not leaving on purpose. My complaint is that I want more of the good stuff. I figure maybe I can just whine about it a while and wait a little (or a lot) longer. Truth be told, although I want and need more love from this sometimes stingy universe, I also appreciate and enjoy the small daily doses of pleasure (cows in a field, songs performed in an unlikely place, really good cake) I’m allotted even while begging in poetry, song, sermons, and mysterious crop circle formations for MORE.
             As I was saying, Eudora Juanita Ricke was needy, messy, talented, beautiful, poetic, undisciplined, needy, courageous, dramatic, outrageous, needy, and, sometimes, an embarrassing palm-reader. Oh God, when she tied the bandana in her hair and instructed her children, in that bad Zsa Zsa Gabor voice of hers, “please dahlinks, call me Inga,” we cringed and sometimes cried.
            Crazy as it was, at least that strange persona, her crazy costume, and certain mixture of scotch and blood flowing through her body got her out, got her going, got her feeling like living again. I’m glad she had that. And that she had my dad who was one bigger-than-life partner for her drama and angst. She hurt him a lot. But he kept coming back and kept taking her to the hospitals and kept taking care of us and kept waiting for something better to break.
                I have often thought about why he stuck with her and with us and with the program, so to speak, given all the grief, which I’m sure he never foresaw when he first took her out for a hamburger and shake after school at Reagan High School in the Houston Heights. I know. I know. It must have been Catholic guilt and their medieval out-dated ideas about divorce and such. Maybe. Maybe not.
                I sometimes wonder whether he was prompted by some other things. Like the fact that his father died when he was young, leaving his mother with a bunch of kids to raise alone. Seeing his big brother Lawrence who sacrificed lots of things to hold the family together when he could have been out setting the world on fire himself. Maybe there was something he heard from a nun (oh yeah, right!) at All Souls Elementary school or in a sermon. Or maybe just the longing for life that had some stability and rhythm to it, or at least as much as he could bring to it, after seeing the ugliness and chaos of the war.
                This story goes on in lots of directions, and I’ve told parts of it before and will tell other parts of it, I’m sure, in the future. Today, I’m thinking about people who want to die. And what to do about it.  Whether ultimately there is anything we can do.
                I’m going to go out on a limb and say that I think my father probably took some goodness, some meaning, out of “saving” my mother. Out of sticking with her, not letting go, not giving up, not deserting us, doing the difficult good thing. It’s easy to say—“well, sure, what else could he do. That’s what people did then.” Or even, “well, maybe he shouldn’t have; think of how much he missed.” But this was real. This was as real as life could get. Sort of like, I guess, some stuff back in the war. He could try to save someone (and, of course, maybe not, but that’s impossible to know). Or he could just not try. I don’t think it’s like he knew what to do. Just that he had to do something. 

            Maybe he was doing penance.
            Actually, I love that idea. 

                I knew a girl once. I guess we kind of dated. Really we only had one date and it was at a diner in Queens. As I watched, she ate the contents of  a whole bottle of ketchup because she was hypoglycemic and she used to binge on sugar for a big, dangerous high (like later that night) and the big, dangerous low to follow (the next morning). And we talked. She had issues. Later, another time, I guess I went to her apartment where I met her family, including her father whom, I learned later, had sexually abused her a lot in her childhood. She was a mess and talked about suicide a lot, but I didn’t know that when I first met her. I just knew that she could sing. And that she was pretty. And Italian.
                I went back to college and she came to visit once. We made pasta with a lot of garlic. She showed me how to do that right. And she came to see me play basketball and had a jealous fit over one of the cheerleaders whom, she was sure, I was dating. I wasn’t. But she was cute, anyway. I didn’t say that during the screaming though. That was the end of that.
                Sort of. Years later, married, Ph. D. , at least two kids already, sitting in my office reading Milton or Chaucer or something, I get a call. It’s from someone at a psychiatric institution in upstate New York asking if I would take a collect call from Ellie (not her real name).  Imagine. I don’t care how long ago that was, it still confuses me. Everything about it.
                I took the call. She told me how horrible it was there. I had no way of gauging the truth of what she was saying. She asked me to come get her. To rescue her. I was the only one who could help her. They would believe me. All that.
                I didn’t just make this up, in case you’re wondering. What did I do? What could I do? I probably said I don’t know, I don’t know, I don’t see how I can do that, a hundred times. I don’t know what I could have done really. But I probably should have done something. At least gone and looked her in the face and talked to her. But what would I tell my wife? How could I take time out from the family? I don’t know. 
               
                We can’t save everyone, can we? Can we? I keep saying and thinking, all these years later, I don’t know. I know that my situation was different from my father’s. All I can conclude is this: I honor what he did; I’m not so sure about me.
                Advent is not just the prelude to Christmas, or a way to “Christianize” the all-important shopping days between Thanksgiving and Christmas. It’s meant to be four weeks of preparation, four weeks of reflection, four weeks, even, of penitential work. Oh God, we really don’t like to think of it that way, do we? So many things bother us about that last phrase. And even the Catholic “spiritual directors” who write about Advent now downplay the penitence part and suggest things like buying a gift for the “angel tree” instead of, say, fasting or confession. I’m good with all of it. Buy the gloves. And we all agree that all of it can be a big empty ritual.
                The one thing I’m sure of is that the rhythm I need is not the one I find from CNN or Fox News or Facebook fake news or ongoing arguments about the same old thing. We need a liturgy, a practice. The liturgy is not every old thing that happens that we want to baptize and call “liturgy”. It’s not the Democratic Platform or the new regime’s immigration policy; it’s not Obama’s first date or my neighbor’s confederate flag. It’s something older and deeper by which we make sense of and order every old thing, including all the noise, some of it necessary, that surrounds us.
                Perhaps the moral arc of the universe swerves towards justice. I don’t necessarily believe that myself. I believe that it might. And it might not. I’m afraid that many of the people who do believe this are not entirely clear about what moral and justice mean. Advent points to a coming King and a coming kingdom, but then things get really confusing to say the least.      
               Will Christ the Savior be born? I’m hoping. I really am. In the mean time, and I do mean mean, let’s try to do better and save some people. Let’s do some salvage work.  Doing the difficult good can look like penance, maybe even be penance.
                I sometimes wonder what my father said in confession after the war. Or, even, just before going into battle. Or when mom was at her worse. I wonder if anything he had done or left undone contributed to his determination to do what he did for his wife and his children. I can’t know. So, for now, I’m going to eat my roots, especially confession and penance. And, yeah, OK, I’ll light a candle. And try to be ready for the phone call. 

“Grant your faithful, we pray, almighty God, the resolve to run forth to meet your Christ with righteous deeds at his coming, so that, gathered at his right hand, they may be worthy to possess the heavenly Kingdom. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son, who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.” Introit for the First Sunday of Advent.  

National Suicide Prevention Hotline: 1-800-273-8255